My mistake, the Raptor has a linkage. You are attempting to make a shock that is meant to use a linkage work without one
The linkage provides longer shock travel. My point is that to use a 660 shock you are drastically changing the geometry at which the shock was designed to work.
figurativley a shock is basically a cylinder, a hydrolic cylinder sees side load as resistance.. and is bushed at the rod accordingly to the side load it recieves, wouldn't the point of the linkage be to gain travel, while retaining the side load that a shock to swinger set up would posses? the answer to your point would be knowing if the linkage would actually lower the resistence to the swing point.. . if the linkage and shock has a lower side load than the shock to swinger. then its possible the 660 shock is less bushed,, than the 300ex.. also a cylinder or shock is only designed to work up and down... the linkage transfers all energy to the shock in a up or down manner... this includes side load
My theory would actually be that they are bushed equally hence the absence of the linkage would have no affect as long as the allotted travel is the same...
right or wrong its my .02c
