pics are deceiving , I think I would fatten it up 1/4 to 1/2 a turn and see what it looks like then
Slammed , I know you are a sports quad guy and not a utility quad guy , but know you are very knowledgeable with engines , so maybe you can answer this one for me , I also have a 92 300 , which is the 1st gen which I didn't think has a rev limiter , or maybe it does and is just set at a higher RPM than the second gen 300's , I know with a tack on the 92 it will turn up over 7K and doesn't sound like it is kicking out , the 2nd gens I have would only turn up 6K , when I put a no limit CDI on my 96 it will exceed 7K and never sound like it is kicking out
Slammed , I know you are a sports quad guy and not a utility quad guy , but know you are very knowledgeable with engines , so maybe you can answer this one for me , I also have a 92 300 , which is the 1st gen which I didn't think has a rev limiter , or maybe it does and is just set at a higher RPM than the second gen 300's , I know with a tack on the 92 it will turn up over 7K and doesn't sound like it is kicking out , the 2nd gens I have would only turn up 6K , when I put a no limit CDI on my 96 it will exceed 7K and never sound like it is kicking out